Utah Concealed Firearms & Training

  • HOME
  • REQUIREMENTS
  • RECIPROCITY
  • FAQ
  • BLOG

WOMAN FEARED HER EX, SO SHE APPLIED FOR A GUN PERMIT.

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Woman Feared Her Ex, So She Applied for a Gun Permit. She Was Murdered While Waiting for NJ to Allow Her to Have One.

Carol Bowne no longer felt safe.

The 39-year-old hairdresser from Berlin Township, New Jersey, was afraid that her ex-boyfriend might try to hurt her. Fearing possible domestic violence, she reportedly filed a restraining order against her ex, installed security cameras and tried to get a gun for self-defense.B9317607458Z.1_20150604172344_000_GJ2B013I4.1-0.jpeg-165x220
But New Jersey’s gun law are notoriously draconian, and the process to merely obtain a handgun permit takes months.

Bowne was found by law enforcement stabbed to death in her driveway on Wednesday night. Her ex-boyfriend, identified as Michael Eitel, 45, has since been arrested and charged with murder. He is a convicted felon with a long rap sheet, according to the Courier-Post:

Court records show Eitel pleaded guilty to a weapons offense in 2008 after being indicted in 2006 on a charge of aggravated assault with bodily injury. He received a five-year sentence for that offense, which neighbors said was related to an assault on a former girlfriend.

Some of Bowne’s friends are now saying that the system failed the woman.

Berlin Township Police Chief Leonard Check confirmed to the Courier-Post that Bowne applied for a handgun license on April 21. She followed up on her application on Monday, he said.

She was murdered on Wednesday.

TUCSON, AZ - JANUARY 15:  Alexis Silva shoots her Glock 27 .40 caliber handgun at the Southwest Regional Park shooting range near the Crossroads of the West Gun Show at the Pima County Fairgrounds on January 15, 2011 in Tucson, Arizona. Today marks one week since Jared Lee Loughner killed six and injured several others, including U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ), who he shot in the head with a 9-millimeter Glock semiautomatic pistol and who remains in critical condition. (Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images)
Check said the handgun license process takes about two months or longer. The process apparently didn’t move any faster even after the woman’s car windows were reportedly shattered right after she filed a restraining order against Eitel.

“She did absolutely everything she was supposed to,” Denise Lovallo, one of Bowne’s work colleagues, said.

Read the full report here.

Filed Under: In The News, Self Defense

SUSPECT’S ATTEMPT TO CARJACK GUN OWNER

Friday, May 22, 2015

Video: Suspect’s Attempt to Carjack Gun Owner Goes Very Wrong — but Watch Until the End to See Cops’ Reaction

Hashim Fannin pulled into a parking lot of an Atlanta Family Dollar store earlier this month and someone immediately slid into his passenger’s seat.

“You know what this is,” the man reportedly said, seemingly letting his “victim” know it was a carjacking.

Before he could say another word, Fannin pulled his firearm and pointed it at the suspect, identified as 61-year-old Edgar Horn. He proceeded to hold his would-be alleged carjacker at gunpoint until police arrived — and a bystander caught it all on video.

Man_holds_suspect_at_gun_point

“You picked the wrong (expletive) to try to rob today,” Fannin can be heard saying in the video.

“I wasn’t trying to rob you,” the suspect pleaded. “I thought you were my friend.”

“You thought I was your friend?” Fannin replied sarcastically. “So you woke up stupid this morning!”

When Horn argued that “everyone makes mistakes,” the gun owner immediately shot back, “You made a mistake and got in my god**n car — yeah, you’re right, that is a mistake.”

Watch the raw footage below:

When Atlanta officers arrived, they shook the gun owner’s hand and took the suspect into custody.

“Good job, man!” one cop is heard saying..

“I look at it like this: Hey, that’s one less guy I’ve got to worry about bothering my mom when she’s out grocery shopping,” Fannin told WSB-TV.

Filed Under: In The News, Self Defense

CAPITOL POLICE NOW RECEIVING TRAINING ON HOW TO GO TO THE BATHROOM

Thursday, May 21, 2015

During our course we talked about how to secure your firearm while using the restroom.  Looks like citizens are not the only people having this problem. PS: Don’t do what you see in the picture below.

As reported in TheBlaze

Capitol Police are receiving training on how to go to the bathroom after incidents where officers mistakenly left their guns behind in restrooms.

Screen-Shot-2015-05-01-at-9.45.09-AM

“We are now providing additional training on what to do when you have to go to the bathroom,” Capitol Police Chief Kim Dine said at a congressional hearing Wednesday.

Roll Call first reported that there have been at least three instances of Capitol Police officers leaving their loaded guns lying around in the last several months, including one that was found by a young child in a bathroom in House Speaker John Boehner’s office suite.

According to the Associated Press, Dine said the officers in each of the incidents were disciplined. The penalty for a first-time offense would be at least a five-day suspension, Dine said, but he’s considering upping that to 30 days, and firing officers for any subsequent violations.

“I would be remiss if I did not say that the officers involved in these recent weapons cases reported in the media in no way intended to leave their weapons unattended. But as noted, this is not acceptable and they will be held accountable,” Dine said. “They do take very seriously their life and safety responsibilities and they acknowledge that they made a mistake.”

He said the department is installing more lock boxes around the Capitol where police weapons can be safely stored if need be.

House Administration Committee Candice Miller (R-Mich.) emphasized the serious nature of the violations.

“Everyone has to go to the bathroom,” she said. “Securing your weapon is of primary importance.”

Filed Under: In The News

MAN DEAD AFTER FOILED CARJACKING IN OREM

Monday, May 4, 2015

You may have heard the story out of Orem.  If not here is a link to the carjacking full story. A few points we can glean from this event.

The first question we often ask in these situations is ‘was it a good shoot?’ Obviously we don’t not have all the facts and lets fact it, the media has been know to embellish irrelevant items while glossing over others.  But if we just take what we know at hand, the answer would have to be “Yes!”.

I base this upon simple criteria:127518

Was there fear of death or serious bodily injury to another person? Yes, this was not so much about the vehicle itself but the fact that the perpetrator was using force to obtain the vehicle.  As we discussed during the course, we don’t use deadly force to protect property, but this was not about the property but the force being used against a person to obtain that property.  The perpetrator committed a forceable felony.

When confronted, the perpetrator attempted to take the firearm from the shooter.  Again, this would constitute a forcible felony and raise to the level of being in fear of death or serious bodily injury.

In reading the comments on KSL (taken with a grain of salt as trolls are very preventing on this site) I would stay there was an overwhelming support for this self defense situation.  There is a lot of speculation as to what the perp might have done if he got away and high speed chases, etc.  I would suggest losing that thought processes if you posses it.  That is akin to saying a person with a firearm is going to shoot up the school, etc. just because they have a firearm. I stay clear of speculating because my crystal ball is in for remain awaiting parts and I would just be guessing.

Filed Under: Frequently Asked Questions, In The News

TIME TO PUT DOWN THAT SMARTPHONE

Monday, May 4, 2015

Q: I see students everywhere — on the bus, walking down the street, in coffee shops — staring at their phones non-stop. My neighbor’s son walked right past me the other day without acknowledging me, that’s how absorbed he was. I think it’s rude and dangerous to disengage from your surroundings like this. What can I say when I see someone paying more attention to a phone than to those around him?

— Name withheld, Brooklyn, N.Y.

A: I hear you, but it would be hard to say anything if you can’t even get someone’s attention! A friend of mine in his 40s, irritated by this very same infraction by younger folks, posted on Facebook how he decided to handle it, writing, “Seeing those people buried in their phones on the sidewalk is one of my biggest pet peeves about walking around the city, so I decided to stop stepping out of the way and let them run into me instead, which happened one night.”635660836927862783-183992313

Assuming no guinea pigs (or humans) were injured in this experiment, that’s one way to get people to take their eyes off the phone and — with any luck — make it a teachable moment. Once you do that, what do you say? I like a firm “Excuuuse me!” Those words, along with the impromptu collision, should provoke a sincere “I’m so sorry, I wasn’t paying attention.” And, I’d hope, an effort by the offender to pay more attention to his or her surroundings, which is important for two reasons.

First, let’s talk about basic safety. Not so long ago, a colleague of mine was walking to the subway in New York — with earbuds in place, fingers blithely tapping away — and oblivious to the person behind her. In seconds, both her phone and handbag were abruptly removed from her possession. I suppose she was lucky that was the extent of the crime, but the theft was not exactly small potatoes: Consumer Reports estimates that more than 3 million Americans had their smartphones stolen in 2013, double the number estimated for the year before.

There’s another, more prosaic reason. Paying attention to your surroundings is not only a way to protect yourself, but it’s also the only way to simply be present, i.e. to experience the street scene about you and to become a part of it. Not to go all Zen-like on you, but I am reminded of this powerful quote from philosopher Eckhart Tolle: “Realize deeply that the present moment is all you ever have. Make the Now the primary focus on your life.”

My friend who played bumper cars on the street told me, “This behavior reminds me of something that I miss most about living in the city, too — eye contact. Used to be that you couldn’t walk down the street without catching the eye of several strangers — and handsome strangers if you were lucky. That hardly happens anymore.” If that occurred more often, maybe I wouldn’t get so many questions from readers about how they hate dating apps.

As for your neighbor’s son, I think a hearty (and loud) greeting from you standing directly in front of him would have been in order: “John! What are you up to today?” Asking a question that requires an answer would, at the very least, force his eyes to leave the screen for a moment.

Filed Under: Frequently Asked Questions, In The News

ELDERLY MAN WAS BEING BEATEN IN A PARKING LOT

Friday, April 24, 2015

Elderly Man Was Being Beaten in a Parking Lot, but It All Came to Grinding Halt After They Noticed a Concealed Carry Holder

Leaving an Arkansas grocery store Wednesday night, one shopper said he witnessed a disturbing altercation — an elderly man getting beaten up while surrounded by a group of seven people.

“That’s just not good odds,” he told KOLR-TV.

Gene talks about what he saw. (Image source: KOLR-TV)
Gene talks about what he saw. (Image source: KOLR-TV)

So the 24-year-old Kroger shopper — who gave only a first name, Gene — decided to do something about the scene in the Little Rock parking lot.

He told KOLR he threw down his bags, stepped to the side — and then pulled out his gun and pointed it at the group.

“I was freaking out,” he told the station. “I was shaking.”

But the move got the group’s attention. ”They kept yelling this isn’t your fight, you need to walk away, you need to put the gun down,” Gene recalled to KOLR.

By this point, other shoppers had pulled out their cellphones and began documenting the standoff and calling police. ”Some lady behind yells, ‘There’s a man with a gun,’ to 911,” Gene said.

pulled-gun-3-e1429886345522

The group and the victim took off before police arrived. Police said they’re all related, and it was a nephew attacking his uncle. The victim, his face bloodied, told police he didn’t want to press charges.

While Gene told KOLR it was the first time he’s drawn his weapon after years of legally carrying one, he would make the same choice if faced with the situation again.pulled-gun-4-e1429886521508

“When you see a crime happening and you see someone getting injured, if you have the ability to stop it, you should do so,” he said.

Gene said he didn’t have it in mind to pull the trigger, and made sure to keep his finger away from it during the altercation.

As for other shoppers interviewed about the incident, they supported Gene’s actions.

“The guy did the right thing,” one woman said.

Filed Under: In The News

‘HOW DOES RENDERING ME DEFENSELESS’ PROTECT YOU?

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

New Documentary Featuring Katie Pavlich Won’t Make Anti-Gun Crowd Happy

The one-hour special debuts April 1 on Outdoor Channel and represents a break from the network’s typical sports and entertainment programming.

Hosted by author, Fox News contributor and Townhill.com News Editor Katie Pavlich, “Safe Haven” makes the case that gun-free zones are not necessarily saving lives, and may actually put more people at risk.

According to the documentary, since 1950, all but two of the mass shootings in America took place in gun-free zones. It cites a study from Purdue University’s Homeland Security Institute when asking the question, “Would having an armed security officer or a teacher with a gun make schools safer?”

Purdue’s computer models suggest two simple things could significantly reduce the number of victims in school shootings — locks on classroom doors and armed school personnel.

Eric Deitz, the Purdue institute’s director, references the fact that average response time by police called to an active shooter situation is ten minutes.

“We’ve seen over and over a single resource officer, or even an armed teacher in a defensive position between attacker and students, can reduce the number of victims by up to 70 percent,” Deitz said.

It’s an issue Dietz told TheBlaze last year must be stripped of emotion.

“The issue of school shootings is obviously a very emotional debate,” he told Jason Howerton at the 2014 NRA convention. “What we are trying to do is take the emotion out of the debate and figure out how we can save the most lives and educate the policy makers, as well as parents and citizens.”

Also featured in the documentary is Special Agent Katherine Schweit of the FBI’s Active Shooter Initiative. Schweit talks about the FBI’s data concerning law enforcement response times to active shooter situations. The FBI’s data points to “the need not only for enhanced preparation on the part of law enforcement and other first responders, but also for civilians to be engaged in discussions and training on decisions they’d have to make in an active shooter situation,” said Schweit.

The documentary points to the story of concealed carry permit holder Amanda Collins to make its case. Despite being licensed to carry a concealed firearm, Collins followed the gun-free zone rules of University of Nevada – Reno and left her weapon at home on days she was attending classes. She was raped, unable to defend herself with her firearm. Compounding Collins’ tragedy, her assailant went on to rape and kill another woman just three months later.

Collins believes had she been allowed to carry her gun on campus, her story would have ended differently.

“I know without a doubt in my mind, that there is a particular point in time, during my attack, that I would have been able to stop it as it was in progress,” she said.

Watch Amanda Collins tell her story:

Filed Under: In The News

NBC USED ONE WORD TO DESCRIBE ICONIC TARGET COMPANY’S PRODUCT

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Now, the Outlet Is Getting Sued

It may explode, but its maker is adamant about one thing: It isn’t a bomb.

Tannerite Sports has filed a libel suit against NBC and WLEX-TV after the news outlets ran a segment claiming Tannerite rifle targets were “bombs.”

The lawsuit alleges NBC made a slew of defamatory claims in a March 23 “Today Show” report, including:

  • On March 23, 2015, Defendant NBCU released a defamatory “report” that falsely claimed that Plaintiff’s rifle targets are “bombs for sale.”
  • In a related video, Defendant NBCU’s investigative reporter falsely asserted that “I am basically holding a bomb in my hand.”
  • NBCU’s report contains one or more written false statements that were intended to impugn Plaintiff’s rifle targets and Plaintiff’s reputation in the hunting industry.
  • On March 24, 2015, Defendant WLEX published an Internet article that falsely
    asserted that Plaintiff’s rifle targets are “ready made bombs [that] are being sold in sporting goods stores . . . .”

The lawsuit goes on to assert that “[Tannerite] rifle targets are not bombs” and that the media outlets “had no evidence” to support their public, malicious claims.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Of course, Tannerite can certainly be used to wreak massive destruction: Last year, TheBlaze covered a viral video of a man blowing up his barn with 164 pounds of Tannerite, and the Today report cited the story of a woman who claimed she was injured when a friend fired on Tannerite targets inside a refrigerator, exploding the appliance and sending shrapnel flying.

But Bearing Arms broke down the composition of Tannerite, noting that its Oregonian inventor Daniel Tanner had “perfected and patented a non-flammable, non-incendiary, extremely stable binary explosive target mixture that leaves nothing behind but a cloud of water vapor and the sound of a concussive blast.”

Bearing Arms continued:

Tannerite cannot be set off with a lit fuse, open flame, or electricity. It cannot be set off by dropping it or striking it. It will not go off if shot with a .22LR rifle, or any common handgun caliber.

Tannerite will go off only if struck by a high velocity rifle bullet moving in excess of 2,000 feet-per-second (FPS). It is not remotely a “bomb” as Jeff Rossen and NBC News claimed, and is perfectly safe and easy to use.

The “Today” report appealed to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for increased regulation on Tannerite, but when the show’s reporters reached out to the company that makes the product, they got the following response: “Only girly-men want to regulate Tannerite Rifle Targets.”

Filed Under: In The News

CONCEALED CARRY PREDICTIONS WAY OFF TARGET

Monday, April 6, 2015

When the Wisconsin Senate gathered in June of 2011 to take up a bill allowing the state’s citizens to carry concealed weapons, protesters around the Capitol building were still in a state of high dudgeon. As a result, Republicans were accused of “rushing” through “socially divisive” bills such as concealed carry and voter identification through the legislative process while the state’s attention was focused elsewhere.

Indeed, on the very day the Senate met to debate concealed weapons, the state Supreme Court issued an opinion upholding Gov. Scott Walker’s union changes. Yet in retrospect, the alleged clandestine nature of concealed carry’s passage didn’t help the bill’s supporters. Instead, it may have aided its opponents a great deal more. Now, four years later, there is scant record of how terrible their hysterical predictions actually turned out.600x4443

Naturally, there were hyperbolic predictions that Wisconsin would become the “Wild West,” where hypothetical people at traffic stops would suddenly open fire on one another. Current Senate Minority Leader Jennifer Shilling (D-La Crosse), whose parents were tragically shot to death more than 20 years ago, once argued that legalizing concealed weapons “kills people,” and that “Guns will beget guns.”

“Rational people can become irrational on occasion — good people can become bad people,” said veteran Democrat Fred Risser of Madison during the debate in June of 2011. “More guns create more possible gun accidents, and there’s going to be more gun deaths.”

Perhaps the most novel anti-concealed carry argument was made by Democratic Sen. Chris Larson of Milwaukee, who argued for exempting zoos from the law. “I don’t think we want to have someone playing ‘Big Buck Safari’ in our zoos with real animals,” said Larson, as if someone might be tempted to take a shot at a giraffe who had beat him in a poker game the night before.

Yet nearly four years later, nearly 250,000 concealed carry licenses have been issued, and one would be hard-pressed to notice any difference in the state. Total violent crimes and murders dropped between 2010 and 2011, the first year concealed carry was partially in effect. After increasing between 2011 and 2012, both measures dropped once again in 2013. Between 2008 and 2013, Wisconsin averaged about 153 murders a year, a far cry from the average of 225 between 1990 and 1995.

Further, regardless of the total violent crimes committed, it’s impossible to attribute those fluctuations to the choice to allow law-abiding citizens to carry firearms. Sure, in one case, a concealed carry permit holder was convicted of shooting a man who had pummeled him, and there have been incidents where loaded guns have been left in public places.

But one of the arguments for concealed carry is that people were carrying anyway, so it’s unclear whether these incidents would have been avoided without a law. People didn’t just start shooting each other when the law passed in June of 2011 — at the very least, those who want to carry must now receive training, which makes everyone safer.

Further, these are a couple of incidents in a state with a quarter-million license holders. Now, Wisconsin citizens are able to exercise their Second Amendment right as they are in every other state, and the crimes prevented because a permit holder might be carrying are impossible to measure.

Of course, anyone paying attention to the facts would have known this to be the case. When Wisconsin passed concealed-carry, it became the 49th state to do so. And upon passage of similar laws in other states, exactly none of them became the open firing ranges concealed carry opponents feared.

In fact, it is now safer to be an American resident than at any time in recent memory. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, firearm-related homicides declined 39% between 1993 and 2011, and non-fatal firearm crimes dropped 69% over the same period. This crime recession came at the same time states all over the country were liberalizing their gun laws allowing more people to carry hidden firearms.

That’s not to say that gun violence isn’t a problem. It is, and every time a police officer shoots a suspect or vice versa, we are reminded of it. A number of high-profile school shooting cases have put the public on edge; according to a 2013 report by Pew, 56% of Americans believe gun crime is higher than two decades ago.

But because the fickle public believes something to be the case, doesn’t mean legislators have to ignore the facts. Instead, they continue to scare people with tales of mafia activity in the kangaroo cage, knowing they rarely will be held accountable for their bogus predictions.

The question is, how wrong do these people have to be before we stop believing them?

Filed Under: In The News

INSANE OPINION PIECE FROM UNC NEWSPAPER THE DAILY TAR HEEL

Thursday, March 26, 2015

UNC Opinion: Concealed carry is no solution for sexual assault

“Students for Concealed Carry took advantage of the national dialogue on sexual assault to push their own agenda by suggesting that easing concealed carry restrictions would curb sexual assaults on campus.

Concealed weapons would not significantly reduce sexual assault and would create inadvertent risks within other forms of interpersonal violence.unc-1-logo-symbol

And concealed weapons would be yet another excuse to blame victims for their own assaults. Like other items on the list of measures that would supposedly prevent attacks, guns would not address the causes of sexual assault. 

Even worse, they could reinforce rape culture because the burden of stopping assault would be further placed upon women. 

Allowing concealed weapons on campus for the purpose of preventing sexual assault will create the unintended consequence of increased homicides stemming from intimate partner violence.

Having guns that are accessible in a household where domestic violence occurs increases the risk of homicide. In 2005, perpetrators used guns in over half of cases of female homicide related to domestic violence.

Expanding concealed carry restrictions on campus would arm potential perpetrators — not just of sexual assault but also of violence in relationships.

To reduce sexual assault, focus should be maintained on preventative programs that challenge rigid gender roles and promote healthy relationships as well as intervention trainings that teach peers to be active bystanders rather than on measures that will not solve the problem.”

A Few Responses:

DAN H-
Hey, I know, instead of making Chicken Little, Sky Is Falling (TM), phobic scenarios why don’t we look at the 20+ states that allow CCW on campus in some form, from allowing it in cars driving through to CCW in the classroom and see where it’s been a problem. Oh my goodness, it has never been an issue. 10+ years of data and none of the fantasies from the anti rights gun phobic have come to pass.

Instead of making everyone else live within your irrational fears, definition of phobia, it would be better if you sought professional help to overcome those irrational fears.

UPSCALEMAN-
You liberals are, beyond question, the dumbest people on the planet Earth.

“Even worse, they could reinforce rape culture because the burden of stopping assault would be further placed upon women.”

There goes “personal responsibility” once again…..it must make your idiot ears shutter to listen to that mantra over and over; that you should do SOMETHING for yourself.

There’s no such thing as a “rape culture.” It’s just another idiot concept developed by a league of idiots to support idiot ideology.

NCLAW44-
From the letter: “Concealed weapons would not significantly reduce sexual assault …” If concealed carry saved one life or stopped one assault, would that not be good? We can’t stop all assaults, but should we not stop the ones that we might, with the tools that are available?

RICHARD MCCARGAR-
There is no “rape culture”. Totally fabricated.
PAT_LOUDOUN-
One thing I noticed in this childish rant. The point of concealed carry is to increase the risk factor of even considering the attempted rape. Not all rapists are drunken fratboys who let things get out of hand or don’t understand that no means no.

If potential rapists were to have to consider that attempting to rape someone might get them shot, that would affect their behavior. At least some of them. Or do you juice boxers honestly think that would never happen?

Filed Under: In The News, Personal Experience/Reviews, Self Defense

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 13
  • Next Page »

Privacy Policy  •  Refund Policy • Copyright © 2025 - Utah CCW Carry